Rightfully Mine

It has been suggested that in a divorce case the father has the greater rights over the mother. In a non-industrialised nation [where wealth is difficult to earn and there is a lack of Government Funded Social Security Benefits] I would agree, since that alleviates the mother from having to worry about how to finance the children's upbringing (often by having to dishonour and humiliate herself through Mut'ah Prostitution-Filth). However industrialised nations have:

1. Reasonably easy access to wealth
2. Government funded Social Security Benefits

so any concerns [about the financial issues surrounding raising the children] are immediately eased. And since Al-Amin has already stated:

1. Paradise lies under the feet of the mother
2. The mother has '75%' more right [than the father] to be honoured by the children

I would argue that in such a context the female has the greater right over the children

What [exactly] is Military Jihad?

Let's consider the following two sentences:

1. He looked at her greedily
2. He looked at her hungrily

Whilst statement 1 is grammatically correct, its bad use of English. Sentence 2 would normally be used.

Now based on my Islamic Model, one would normally use 'Jihad' in the Military context to 'struggle/strive to achieve excellence as a Military Officer in a Military Academy'. On the battlefield:

1. Using 'Jihad' implies 'a struggle' to achieve victory
2. Using 'Harb' implies 'fighting ferociously' to achieve victory

One could use 'Jihad' in this context but it would be 'bad use of Arabic' - instead 'Harb' would be used. Bearing in mind demented Arabs keep screaming 'Jihad Jihad' instead of 'Harb, Harb', [forgive me if I'm wrong but] I am left somewhat bemused at the [apparent] poor use of their own language [by the Arabs]!

Further Thoughts

I would argue that Islam's 'Golden Ages' were always based on Societies that implemented my Islamic Model in some form or other

My Islam

Having criticised Wahabism and Shi-itism, the natural question is: What do I believe?

Well this is my ‘Islamic Model’

Profession	Applying skills to make positive constructive impact upon Society	Analysible
Law	Interface between Social and Profession
Social	Manners & Behaviour
	Sexual and Social Discipline
	Hygiene
	Anti-Iblis Discipline and Protection: 5 times Salat Fasting Hajj and Umrah Charity	Non-Analysible
Beliefs	Prophets
	Angels, Djinn
	God, His Attributes
	Shahadah

Non-Analysible: We have no instruments for analysing such issues. Either we believe them or we reject them

Analysible: We either have or can develop instruments to measure such issues

I have structured this table deliberately. Shahadah is the most primitive belief, followed by belief in God and His Attributes, the Angels and Djinn and finally, The Prophets

After that we focus on Social Aspects beginning with Anti-Iblis disciple and protection through Salat etc etc Note Salat and Fasting are particularly effective protective shields against doubt created through constant attacks by Iblis and his minions

At the next level we focus on hygiene

Next we focus on Sexual and Social Disciple in order to control our nafs

The next level focuses on manners and behaviour.

By the time we reach the ‘Law Level’ we are ready to create a balanced Society (since we are ready to focus on the relationships between ourselves and those around us), and this level is such that it crosses the path from ‘Social’ entity to Profession

Once we enter the ‘Profession’ level, we focus on using our skills to make a positive constructive impact upon Society.

Strangely enough, emotions like ‘love’, ‘hate’ etc etc all fall under ‘Law’ since they affect two or more people. Whilst this may sound ‘cold and dispassionate’ it is critically important to protect the needs and rights of individuals when they are exposed to other people’s emotions

Jihad is the constant struggle to achieve excellence in our ‘Social’, ‘Law’ and ‘Profession’ responsibilities

Kafir is someone who suffers from irrational hatred of Islam. Such a person is akin to those people who suffer from irrational hatred of other racial profiles (eg African etc etc)

My ‘Islamic Model’ is quite complex, but it reflects my understanding of Islam

Here come the [Shi-ite] Drug-Traffikers!

The Pakistani Sopranos [1] are back in town!! Will the Public string them up this time around?

Pakistan's kismet seems to be a choice between Mawdudi's children and the [Shi-ite] Pakistani Mafia! Ahh [Shi-ite] Women's Empowerment in Pakistan! The biggest hardcore criminals all using 'Female Liberation' as a cover to spread fitna and fassad throughout the Lands whilst filling their pockets with tax-wealth!

May Allah protect Pakistan in Her great time of need

References:
1. http://www.bakersfield.com/893/story/393575.html

Obtuse Vision

Whilst the critic's arguments are sound [1], its a little difficult to analyse anything based on a single hadith (or even several individual ahadith). We have no context, no understanding of implications...nothing. All we know is the immediate story (which is a 'mere' 1400 years old) and from that a conclusion is being derived that Al-Amin was barbaric.

Let's apply this obtuse logic in a more modern setting...Pre-WWII Europe (only 70 years ago).

1. Pre-WWII Europe was powered by Enlightenment
2. Pre-WWII Europe was THE global power
3. Pre-WWII Europe was the MOST civilised and sophisticated peoples in Human History
4. Pre-WWII Europe is the origins of MOST Americans. Therefore USA is essentially European
5. Pre-WWII Europe was responsible for:
a. The Holocaust in which tens of millions of innocent civilians were slaughtered in the most brutal ways possible
b. WWII which claimed the lives of 100 million+ lives

Conclusion: Europeans are the MOST murderously barbaric nation in human history

Using obtuse logic can lead us to er...interesting conclusions. That's why thorough analysis is required BEFORE arriving at ANY conclusion.

References:
1. http://www.kactuzkid.com/excuses.html

Fucking Shi-ite Bastards

Just as Wahabis have their '5 Pillars of Islam', I suspect Shi-ites have the following three:

1. Taqiyya: Basically pretending to be all sweet upfront whilst hiding devastating intentions
2. Mut'ah: Prostitution given a 'fancy' name
3. Poisoning Others: Best way of removing 'obstacles in life'

I also suspect their attitude towards females is:

1. Honourable females should remain housebound to rot til death
2. 'Bazaari' females (or Prostitutes) are the ones who foolishly choose to venture out of their homes. If Honourable females want to venture outside they need to wear the 'Black Tent' (to hide their identity) otherwise Shi-ites will treat them as 'Bazaari'

If we accept this as 'the truth' then:

1. Certain demented practices amongst Muslim Communities start to make sense eg using psychological pressure (which can turn to physical violence) on females to remain at home because "Aurat ki izzat ghar mein hai" (ie "a Female's Honour is in her Home")
2. May Allah totally and utterly annihilate this Shi-ite curse/disease (and their Hashemite Masters) that has afflicted [and unbalanced] the Muslim World
3. Ironically Wahabi-ism is the most effective immediate anti-dote to this Shi-ite curse, since Wahabis are obsessed with Self-Discipline (and 'avoiding doing the wrong thing')

Strangely enough I remember this [forceful] 'female in the home' culture prevalent amongst UK Households up until the early1990s, and I'm left wondering if these [fucking] Shi-ites [bastards] somehow managed to influence British Society with their disgusting Cultural Filth.